From bf48d49a976067cc93ecf79ac20514d3d631feb5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "A. Wilcox" <AWilcox@Wilcox-Tech.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 06:37:50 -0500
Subject: Update roadmap

---
 doc/roadmap.rst | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

(limited to 'doc')

diff --git a/doc/roadmap.rst b/doc/roadmap.rst
index d78f36d..0a752ed 100644
--- a/doc/roadmap.rst
+++ b/doc/roadmap.rst
@@ -38,6 +38,10 @@ a specific YANG module, it can just be removed from the list to import.
 
 Outstanding TBDs
 ````````````````
+* None.
+
+Resolved TBDs
+`````````````
 * The ``modules-state`` requires a ``module-set-id`` which represents the
   unique combination of YANG modules present and loaded in a NETCONF server.
   We have freedom to implement this however we like.  One thought is to take
@@ -46,9 +50,11 @@ Outstanding TBDs
   but this would also mean that tooling that caches modules would pull in all
   modules on every server restart.
 
-Resolved TBDs
-`````````````
-* None.
+  **Resolution**: We went with sha256 of a comma-separated list of Python
+  module names.  This is expected to be the cleanest way to do this; it allows
+  the implementation to provide the same ``module-set-id`` when modules stay
+  the same, but also changes ``module-set-id`` if a new module replaces an
+  existing one for the same namespace (which may require data to be reloaded).
 
 
 
@@ -104,9 +110,6 @@ The system module allows basic administration of system configuration.
 
 Outstanding TBDs
 ````````````````
-* Do we support NTP?  If so, which implementation?  Prefer chrony because it's
-  available on Adélie (openntpd isn't available due to ppc/be issues)
-
 * Where do we store the ``contact`` and ``location`` node information?
 
 * When the admin tries to set ``timezone-utf-offset``, do we make a custom
@@ -128,7 +131,13 @@ Outstanding TBDs
 
 Resolved TBDs
 `````````````
-* None.
+* Do we support NTP?  If so, which implementation?  Prefer chrony because it's
+  available on Adélie (openntpd isn't available due to ppc/be issues)
+
+  **Resolution**: Yes, NTP support is desireable.  THe implementation is
+  ``ntpsec``.  It has been packaged and tested for Adélie/ppc64, so it appears
+  portable.
+
 
 
 
@@ -239,7 +248,7 @@ Resolved TBDs
 ==========
 
 [ ] Software module
-------------------
+-------------------
 
 * [ ] Define model
 
@@ -310,9 +319,9 @@ Outstanding TBDs
 ````````````````
 * How do we determine when a RIB entry was modified?
 
+Resolved TBDs
+`````````````
 * Per kernel docs, the Linux kernel supports 242 user-defined RIBs in addition
   to default and main.  Do we want to expose that (feature ``multiple-ribs``)?
 
-Resolved TBDs
-`````````````
-* None.
+  **Resolution**: Yes, we expose feature ``multiple-ribs``.
-- 
cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2