summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorTimo Teräs <timo.teras@iki.fi>2012-10-03 14:59:48 +0300
committerTimo Teräs <timo.teras@iki.fi>2012-10-03 15:07:31 +0300
commit4dd8c58df9aa2e7821a7d5bb50407033858ed1c3 (patch)
tree30d79f7cb8222f5fc468f94a89d2c794a95976b1
parent081155c438c0680b868175c95d160f1e3b519541 (diff)
downloadapk-tools-4dd8c58df9aa2e7821a7d5bb50407033858ed1c3.tar.gz
apk-tools-4dd8c58df9aa2e7821a7d5bb50407033858ed1c3.tar.bz2
apk-tools-4dd8c58df9aa2e7821a7d5bb50407033858ed1c3.tar.xz
apk-tools-4dd8c58df9aa2e7821a7d5bb50407033858ed1c3.zip
solver: various fixes
* push_decision expects to always get the package primary 'name' as apk_name. ASSERT that and fix problem cases. (though - this might need to be reverted, and store the non primary name in apk_decision instead to accomodate for better backtracking optimizations) * fix error reporting of virtual package names * make 'assign_name' errors soft. the incorrect packages just are no longer consider instead of aborting whole calculation. * fix backtracking of virtual packages that are not depended directly
-rw-r--r--src/solver.c72
1 files changed, 58 insertions, 14 deletions
diff --git a/src/solver.c b/src/solver.c
index edf1650..3fb7832 100644
--- a/src/solver.c
+++ b/src/solver.c
@@ -706,10 +706,14 @@ static inline void assign_name(
struct apk_solver_state *ss, struct apk_name *name, struct apk_provider p)
{
if (p.version == &apk_null_blob) {
- ASSERT(!name->ss.locked || name->ss.chosen.version == &apk_null_blob,
- "Assigning locked name with version");
+ /* Assigning locked name with version is a problem;
+ * generally package providing same name twice */
+ if (name->ss.locked && name->ss.chosen.version != &apk_null_blob)
+ ss->impossible_state = 1;
} else {
- ASSERT(!name->ss.locked, "Assigning locked name");
+ /* Similar to above */
+ if (name->ss.locked)
+ ss->impossible_state = 1;
}
name->ss.chosen = p;
name->ss.locked++;
@@ -721,7 +725,7 @@ static inline void assign_name(
static inline void unassign_name(struct apk_solver_state *ss, struct apk_name *name)
{
- ASSERT(name->ss.locked, "Unassigning unlocked name");
+ ASSERT(name->ss.locked, "Unassigning unlocked name %s", name->name);
name->ss.locked--;
if (name->ss.locked == 0) {
name->ss.chosen = CHOSEN_NONE;
@@ -793,7 +797,7 @@ static solver_result_t apply_decision(struct apk_solver_state *ss,
addscore(&ss->score, &score);
name->ss.chosen = CHOSEN_NONE;
- name->ss.locked = 1;
+ name->ss.locked++;
list_del(&name->ss.unsolved_list);
list_init(&name->ss.unsolved_list);
} else {
@@ -847,7 +851,7 @@ static void undo_decision(struct apk_solver_state *ss,
for (i = 0; i < pkg->provides->num; i++)
pkg->provides->item[i].name->ss.name_touched = 1;
- if (name->ss.locked) {
+ if (d->type == DECISION_ASSIGN) {
if (ps->handle_install_if)
foreach_rinstall_if_pkg(ss, pkg, untrigger_install_if);
foreach_dependency(ss, pkg->depends, undo_constraint);
@@ -871,12 +875,12 @@ static void undo_decision(struct apk_solver_state *ss,
if (d->type == DECISION_ASSIGN) {
get_unassigned_score(name, &score);
subscore(&ss->score, &score);
+ name->ss.locked--;
} else {
name->ss.none_excluded = 0;
}
/* Put back the name to unsolved list */
- name->ss.locked = 0;
promote_name(ss, name);
}
}
@@ -890,6 +894,9 @@ static solver_result_t push_decision(struct apk_solver_state *ss,
{
struct apk_decision *d;
+ ASSERT(pkg == NULL || pkg->name == name,
+ "push_decision got non-primary name: %s != %s",
+ pkg->name->name, name->name);
ASSERT(ss->num_decisions <= ss->max_decisions,
"Decision tree overflow.");
@@ -897,6 +904,8 @@ static solver_result_t push_decision(struct apk_solver_state *ss,
d = &ss->decisions[ss->num_decisions];
#ifdef DEBUG_CHECKS
+ dbg_printf("Saving score ("SCORE_FMT") and requirers (%d) for %s\n",
+ SCORE_PRINTF(&ss->score), name->ss.requirers, name->name);
d->saved_score = ss->score;
d->saved_requirers = name->ss.requirers;
#endif
@@ -911,6 +920,12 @@ static solver_result_t push_decision(struct apk_solver_state *ss,
d->pkg = pkg;
d->no_package = 0;
}
+ /* FIXME: this is needed for virtual packages - should possible
+ * consider making backtracking information also keep the
+ * virtual apk_name causing the touched information to be more
+ * accurate */
+ if (name->ss.last_touched_decision == 0)
+ name->ss.last_touched_decision = ss->num_decisions;
return apply_decision(ss, d);
}
@@ -931,8 +946,8 @@ static int next_branch(struct apk_solver_state *ss)
SCORE_PRINTF(&d->saved_score),
SCORE_PRINTF(&ss->score));
ASSERT(d->saved_requirers == name->ss.requirers,
- "Requirers not restored between decisions (%s)",
- name->name);
+ "Requirers not restored between decisions (%s), %d != %d",
+ name->name, d->saved_requirers, name->ss.requirers);
#endif
if (backup_until >= ss->num_decisions &&
@@ -940,6 +955,10 @@ static int next_branch(struct apk_solver_state *ss)
d->branching_point = BRANCH_NO;
d->type = (d->type == DECISION_ASSIGN) ? DECISION_EXCLUDE : DECISION_ASSIGN;
return apply_decision(ss, d);
+ } else {
+ if (d->branching_point == BRANCH_YES)
+ dbg_printf("skipping %s, %d < %d\n",
+ name->name, backup_until, ss->num_decisions);
}
if (d->no_package && !d->found_solution) {
@@ -963,11 +982,15 @@ static void apply_constraint(struct apk_solver_state *ss, struct apk_dependency
if (ss->num_decisions > 0) {
requirer_name = decision_to_name(&ss->decisions[ss->num_decisions]);
requirer_pkg = decision_to_pkg(&ss->decisions[ss->num_decisions]);
+ /* FIXME: should probably take into account the requirer
+ * package's provided name's 'requirer strength' */
strength = requirer_name->ss.requirers ?: 1;
} else {
strength = 1;
}
+ dbg_printf("--->apply_constraint: %s (strength %d)\n", name->name, strength);
+
if (name->ss.locked) {
if (name->ss.chosen.pkg)
dbg_printf("%s: locked to " PKG_VER_FMT " already\n",
@@ -1021,8 +1044,10 @@ static void apply_constraint(struct apk_solver_state *ss, struct apk_dependency
if (changed)
name->ss.last_touched_decision = ss->num_decisions;
- if (!dep->conflict)
+ if (!dep->conflict) {
+ dbg_printf("%s requirers += %d\n", name->name, strength);
name->ss.requirers += strength;
+ }
promote_name(ss, name);
}
@@ -1041,6 +1066,8 @@ static void undo_constraint(struct apk_solver_state *ss, struct apk_dependency *
strength = 1;
}
+ dbg_printf("--->undo_constraint: %s (strength %d)\n", name->name, strength);
+
if (name->ss.locked) {
if (name->ss.chosen.pkg != NULL) {
dbg_printf(PKG_VER_FMT " selected already for %s\n",
@@ -1091,8 +1118,16 @@ static void undo_constraint(struct apk_solver_state *ss, struct apk_dependency *
if (name->ss.last_touched_decision > ss->num_decisions)
name->ss.last_touched_decision = ss->num_decisions;
- if (!dep->conflict)
+ if (requirer_name && requirer_name->ss.requirers != strength) {
+ dbg_printf("requirer %s, dependency %s: strength mismatch %d != %d\n",
+ requirer_name->name, name->name,
+ requirer_name->ss.requirers, strength);
+ }
+
+ if (!dep->conflict) {
name->ss.requirers -= strength;
+ dbg_printf("%s requirers -= %d\n", name->name, strength);
+ }
demote_name(ss, name);
}
@@ -1144,7 +1179,7 @@ static int reconsider_name(struct apk_solver_state *ss, struct apk_name *name)
/* viable alternative? */
if (cmpscore2(&ss->score, &pkg0_score, &ss->best_score) >= 0)
- return push_decision(ss, name, pkg0, DECISION_EXCLUDE, BRANCH_NO, FALSE);
+ return push_decision(ss, pkg0->name, pkg0, DECISION_EXCLUDE, BRANCH_NO, FALSE);
if (cmpscore(&pkg0_score, &best_score) < 0) {
best_score = pkg0_score;
@@ -1169,9 +1204,10 @@ static int reconsider_name(struct apk_solver_state *ss, struct apk_name *name)
return SOLVERR_PRUNED;
return push_decision(ss, name, NULL, DECISION_ASSIGN, BRANCH_NO, FALSE);
} else if (options == 1 && score_locked && name->ss.none_excluded && name == next_p->pkg->name) {
+ struct apk_package *pkg0 = next_p->pkg;
dbg_printf("reconsider_name: %s: only one choice left with known score, locking.\n",
name->name);
- return push_decision(ss, name, next_p->pkg, DECISION_ASSIGN, BRANCH_NO, FALSE);
+ return push_decision(ss, pkg0->name, pkg0, DECISION_ASSIGN, BRANCH_NO, FALSE);
}
name->ss.chosen = *next_p;
@@ -1916,7 +1952,10 @@ static void print_dep_errors(struct apk_database *db, char *label,
for (i = 0; i < deps->num; i++) {
struct apk_dependency *dep = &deps->item[i];
- struct apk_package *pkg = (struct apk_package*) dep->name->state_ptr;
+ struct apk_package *pkg = NULL;
+
+ if (dep->name->state_int != 1)
+ pkg = (struct apk_package*) dep->name->state_ptr;
if (apk_dep_is_materialized_or_provided(dep, pkg))
continue;
@@ -1953,6 +1992,11 @@ void apk_solver_print_errors(struct apk_database *db,
for (i = 0; i < solution->num; i++) {
struct apk_package *pkg = solution->item[i].pkg;
pkg->name->state_ptr = pkg;
+ for (j = 0; j < pkg->provides->num; j++) {
+ if (pkg->provides->item[j].version == &apk_null_blob)
+ continue;
+ pkg->provides->item[j].name->state_ptr = pkg;
+ }
}
print_dep_errors(db, "world", world, &names);