musl - The musl libc tree (WIP / dev branches)

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Files	Lines
2011-04-01	avoid over-allocation of brk on first malloc	Rich Felker	1	-4/+4
	if init_malloc returns positive (successful first init), malloc will retry getting a chunk from the free bins rather than expanding the heap again. also pass init_malloc a hint for the size of the initial allocation.
2011-03-30	rename __simple_malloc.c to lite_malloc.c - yes this affects behavior!	Rich Felker	1	-0/+0
	why does this affect behavior? well, the linker seems to traverse archive files starting from its current position when resolving symbols. since calloc.c comes alphabetically (and thus in sequence in the archive file) between __simple_malloc.c and malloc.c, attempts to resolve the "malloc" symbol for use by calloc.c were pulling in the full malloc.c implementation rather than the __simple_malloc.c implementation. as of now, lite_malloc.c and malloc.c are adjacent in the archive and in the correct order, so malloc.c should never be used to resolve "malloc" unless it's already needed to resolve another symbol ("free" or "realloc").
2011-03-23	very cheap double-free checks in malloc	Rich Felker	1	-0/+4

2011-03-20	global cleanup to use the new syscall interface	Rich Felker	1	-1/+1

2011-02-20	make malloc(0) return unique pointers rather than NULL	Rich Felker	2	-6/+10
	this change is made with some reluctance, but i think it's for the best. correct programs must handle either behavior, so there is little advantage to having malloc(0) return NULL. and i managed to actually make the malloc code slightly smaller with this change.
2011-02-20	fix simple_malloc malloc(0) behavior not to return non-unique pointers	Rich Felker	1	-0/+1

2011-02-20	fix simple_malloc size restrictions	Rich Felker	1	-5/+6
	do not allow allocations that overflow ptrdiff_t; fix some overflow checks that were not quite right but didn't matter due to address layout implementation.
2011-02-12	initial check-in, version 0.5.0v0.5.0	Rich Felker	7	-0/+671