summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--system/openssl/APKBUILD8
-rw-r--r--system/openssl/CVE-2023-0465.patch51
2 files changed, 3 insertions, 56 deletions
diff --git a/system/openssl/APKBUILD b/system/openssl/APKBUILD
index 851c4f7ae..9e178ca77 100644
--- a/system/openssl/APKBUILD
+++ b/system/openssl/APKBUILD
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
# Maintainer: A. Wilcox <awilfox@adelielinux.org>
pkgname=openssl
-pkgver=1.1.1t
-pkgrel=1
+pkgver=1.1.1v
+pkgrel=0
pkgdesc="Toolkit for SSL and TLS"
url="https://www.openssl.org/"
arch="all"
@@ -12,7 +12,6 @@ makedepends_build="perl"
subpackages="$pkgname-dbg $pkgname-dev $pkgname-doc libcrypto1.1:libcrypto
libssl1.1:libssl"
source="https://www.openssl.org/source/${pkgname}-${pkgver}.tar.gz
- CVE-2023-0465.patch
ppc-auxv.patch
ppc64.patch
"
@@ -132,7 +131,6 @@ libssl() {
done
}
-sha512sums="628676c9c3bc1cf46083d64f61943079f97f0eefd0264042e40a85dbbd988f271bfe01cd1135d22cc3f67a298f1d078041f8f2e97b0da0d93fe172da573da18c openssl-1.1.1t.tar.gz
-c86d1a74387f3e0ff085e2785bd834b529fdc6b397fa8f559d413b9fa4e35848523c58ce94e00e75b17f55af28f58f0c347973a739a5d15465e205391fc59b26 CVE-2023-0465.patch
+sha512sums="1a67340d99026aa62bf50ff89165d9f77fe4a6690fe30d1751b5021dd3f238391afd581b41724687c322c4e3af1770c44a63766a06e9b8cab6425101153e0c7e openssl-1.1.1v.tar.gz
7fd3158c6eb3451f10e4bfd78f85c3e7aef84716eb38e00503d5cfc8e414b7bdf02e0671d0299a96a453dd2e38249dcf1281136b27b6df372f3ea08fbf78329b ppc-auxv.patch
e040f23770d52b988578f7ff84d77563340f37c026db7643db8e4ef18e795e27d10cb42cb8656da4d9c57a28283a2828729d70f940edc950c3422a54fea55509 ppc64.patch"
diff --git a/system/openssl/CVE-2023-0465.patch b/system/openssl/CVE-2023-0465.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index a270624d3..000000000
--- a/system/openssl/CVE-2023-0465.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,51 +0,0 @@
-From b013765abfa80036dc779dd0e50602c57bb3bf95 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
-Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2023 16:52:55 +0000
-Subject: [PATCH] Ensure that EXFLAG_INVALID_POLICY is checked even in leaf
- certs
-
-Even though we check the leaf cert to confirm it is valid, we
-later ignored the invalid flag and did not notice that the leaf
-cert was bad.
-
-Fixes: CVE-2023-0465
-
-Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
-Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
-(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20588)
----
- crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c | 11 +++++++++--
- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
-
-diff --git a/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c b/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c
-index 925fbb54125..1dfe4f9f31a 100644
---- a/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c
-+++ b/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c
-@@ -1649,18 +1649,25 @@ static int check_policy(X509_STORE_CTX *ctx)
- }
- /* Invalid or inconsistent extensions */
- if (ret == X509_PCY_TREE_INVALID) {
-- int i;
-+ int i, cbcalled = 0;
-
- /* Locate certificates with bad extensions and notify callback. */
-- for (i = 1; i < sk_X509_num(ctx->chain); i++) {
-+ for (i = 0; i < sk_X509_num(ctx->chain); i++) {
- X509 *x = sk_X509_value(ctx->chain, i);
-
- if (!(x->ex_flags & EXFLAG_INVALID_POLICY))
- continue;
-+ cbcalled = 1;
- if (!verify_cb_cert(ctx, x, i,
- X509_V_ERR_INVALID_POLICY_EXTENSION))
- return 0;
- }
-+ if (!cbcalled) {
-+ /* Should not be able to get here */
-+ X509err(X509_F_CHECK_POLICY, ERR_R_INTERNAL_ERROR);
-+ return 0;
-+ }
-+ /* The callback ignored the error so we return success */
- return 1;
- }
- if (ret == X509_PCY_TREE_FAILURE) {