diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | system/openssl/APKBUILD | 6 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | system/openssl/CVE-2023-0465.patch | 51 |
2 files changed, 56 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/system/openssl/APKBUILD b/system/openssl/APKBUILD index cf3ac587e..851c4f7ae 100644 --- a/system/openssl/APKBUILD +++ b/system/openssl/APKBUILD @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ # Maintainer: A. Wilcox <awilfox@adelielinux.org> pkgname=openssl pkgver=1.1.1t -pkgrel=0 +pkgrel=1 pkgdesc="Toolkit for SSL and TLS" url="https://www.openssl.org/" arch="all" @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ makedepends_build="perl" subpackages="$pkgname-dbg $pkgname-dev $pkgname-doc libcrypto1.1:libcrypto libssl1.1:libssl" source="https://www.openssl.org/source/${pkgname}-${pkgver}.tar.gz + CVE-2023-0465.patch ppc-auxv.patch ppc64.patch " @@ -60,6 +61,8 @@ source="https://www.openssl.org/source/${pkgname}-${pkgver}.tar.gz # - CVE-2019-1551 # 1.1.1g-r0: # - CVE-2020-1967 +# 1.1.1t-r1: +# - CVE-2023-0465 build() { # openssl will prepend crosscompile always core CC et al @@ -130,5 +133,6 @@ libssl() { } sha512sums="628676c9c3bc1cf46083d64f61943079f97f0eefd0264042e40a85dbbd988f271bfe01cd1135d22cc3f67a298f1d078041f8f2e97b0da0d93fe172da573da18c openssl-1.1.1t.tar.gz +c86d1a74387f3e0ff085e2785bd834b529fdc6b397fa8f559d413b9fa4e35848523c58ce94e00e75b17f55af28f58f0c347973a739a5d15465e205391fc59b26 CVE-2023-0465.patch 7fd3158c6eb3451f10e4bfd78f85c3e7aef84716eb38e00503d5cfc8e414b7bdf02e0671d0299a96a453dd2e38249dcf1281136b27b6df372f3ea08fbf78329b ppc-auxv.patch e040f23770d52b988578f7ff84d77563340f37c026db7643db8e4ef18e795e27d10cb42cb8656da4d9c57a28283a2828729d70f940edc950c3422a54fea55509 ppc64.patch" diff --git a/system/openssl/CVE-2023-0465.patch b/system/openssl/CVE-2023-0465.patch new file mode 100644 index 000000000..a270624d3 --- /dev/null +++ b/system/openssl/CVE-2023-0465.patch @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@ +From b013765abfa80036dc779dd0e50602c57bb3bf95 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> +Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2023 16:52:55 +0000 +Subject: [PATCH] Ensure that EXFLAG_INVALID_POLICY is checked even in leaf + certs + +Even though we check the leaf cert to confirm it is valid, we +later ignored the invalid flag and did not notice that the leaf +cert was bad. + +Fixes: CVE-2023-0465 + +Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org> +Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org> +(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20588) +--- + crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c | 11 +++++++++-- + 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c b/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c +index 925fbb54125..1dfe4f9f31a 100644 +--- a/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c ++++ b/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c +@@ -1649,18 +1649,25 @@ static int check_policy(X509_STORE_CTX *ctx) + } + /* Invalid or inconsistent extensions */ + if (ret == X509_PCY_TREE_INVALID) { +- int i; ++ int i, cbcalled = 0; + + /* Locate certificates with bad extensions and notify callback. */ +- for (i = 1; i < sk_X509_num(ctx->chain); i++) { ++ for (i = 0; i < sk_X509_num(ctx->chain); i++) { + X509 *x = sk_X509_value(ctx->chain, i); + + if (!(x->ex_flags & EXFLAG_INVALID_POLICY)) + continue; ++ cbcalled = 1; + if (!verify_cb_cert(ctx, x, i, + X509_V_ERR_INVALID_POLICY_EXTENSION)) + return 0; + } ++ if (!cbcalled) { ++ /* Should not be able to get here */ ++ X509err(X509_F_CHECK_POLICY, ERR_R_INTERNAL_ERROR); ++ return 0; ++ } ++ /* The callback ignored the error so we return success */ + return 1; + } + if (ret == X509_PCY_TREE_FAILURE) { |