summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lib
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'lib')
-rw-r--r--lib/spack/docs/basic_usage.rst137
1 files changed, 92 insertions, 45 deletions
diff --git a/lib/spack/docs/basic_usage.rst b/lib/spack/docs/basic_usage.rst
index ddf7109a40..0a0c2c678c 100644
--- a/lib/spack/docs/basic_usage.rst
+++ b/lib/spack/docs/basic_usage.rst
@@ -308,19 +308,19 @@ completely remove the directory in which the package was installed.
spack uninstall mpich
If there are still installed packages that depend on the package to be
-uninstalled, spack will issue a warning. In general, it is safer to
-remove dependent packages *before* removing their dependencies. Not
-doing so risks breaking packages on your system. To remove a package
-without regard for its dependencies, run ``spack uninstall -f
-<package>`` to override the warning.
+uninstalled, spack will refuse to uninstall. If you know what you're
+doing, you can override this with ``spack uninstall -f <package>``.
+However, running this risks breaking other installed packages. In
+general, it is safer to remove dependent packages *before* removing
+their dependencies.
A line like ``spack uninstall mpich`` may be ambiguous, if multiple
``mpich`` configurations are installed. For example, if both
``mpich@3.0.2`` and ``mpich@3.1`` are installed, it could refer to
either one, and Spack cannot determine which one to uninstall. Spack
-will ask you to provide a version number to remove any ambiguity. For
-example, ``spack uninstall mpich@3.1`` is unambiguous in the
-above scenario.
+will ask you to provide a version number to remove the ambiguity. For
+example, ``spack uninstall mpich@3.1`` is unambiguous in the above
+scenario.
.. _sec-specs:
@@ -641,35 +641,41 @@ versions are now filtered out.
.. _shell-support:
-Interactive Shell Support
+Environment Modules
-------------------------------
-Spack provides some limited shell support to make it easier to use the
-packages it provides. You can enable shell support by sourcing some
-files in the ``/share/spack`` directory.
+.. note::
-For ``bash`` or ``ksh``, run::
+ Environment module support is currently experimental and should not
+ be considered a stable feature of Spack. In particular, the
+ interface and/or generated module names may change in future
+ versions.
+
+Spack provides some limited integration with environment module
+systems to make it easier to use the packages it provides.
+
+You can enable shell support by sourcing some files in the
+``/share/spack`` directory.
+
+For ``bash`` or ``ksh``, run:
+
+.. code-block:: sh
- . $SPACK_ROOT/share/spack/setup-env.sh
+ . $SPACK_ROOT/share/spack/setup-env.sh
For ``csh`` and ``tcsh`` run:
- setenv SPACK_ROOT /path/to/spack
- source $SPACK_ROOT/share/spack/setup-env.csh
+.. code-block:: csh
+
+ setenv SPACK_ROOT /path/to/spack
+ source $SPACK_ROOT/share/spack/setup-env.csh
You can put the above code in your ``.bashrc`` or ``.cshrc``, and
Spack's shell support will be available on the command line.
-Environment Modules
-------------------------------
-.. note::
-
- Environment module support is currently experimental and should not
- be considered a stable feature of Spack. In particular, the
- interface and/or generated module names may change in future
- versions.
When you install a package with Spack, it automatically generates an
environment module that lets you add the package to your environment.
@@ -736,50 +742,63 @@ of installed packages.
The names here should look familiar, they're the same ones from
``spack find``. You *can* use the names here directly. For example,
-you could type either of these:
+you could type either of these commands to load the callpath module
+(assuming dotkit and modules are installed):
.. code-block:: sh
use callpath@1.0.1%gcc@4.4.7-5dce4318
- module load callpath@1.0.1%gcc@4.4.7-5dce4318
-And they would work fine. However, that is not particularly pretty,
-easy to remember, or easy to type.
+.. code-block:: sh
+
+ module load callpath@1.0.1%gcc@4.4.7-5dce4318
-Luckily, Spack has its own interface for using modules and dotkits.
-You can use the same spec syntax you're used to:
+Neither of these is particularly pretty, easy to remember, or
+easy to type. Luckily, Spack has its own interface for using modules
+and dotkits. You can use the same spec syntax you're used to:
-Modules:
- * ``spack load <spec>``
- * ``spack unload <spec>``
-Dotkit:
- * ``spack use <spec>``
- * ``spack unuse <spec>``
+ ========================= ==========================
+ Modules Dotkit
+ ========================= ==========================
+ ``spack load <spec>`` ``spack use <spec>``
+ ``spack unload <spec>`` ``spack unuse <spec>``
+ ========================= ==========================
And you can use the same shortened names you use everywhere else in
-Spack. For example:
+Spack. For example, this will add the ``mpich`` package built with
+``gcc`` to your path:
.. code-block:: sh
$ spack install mpich %gcc@4.4.7
+
# ... wait for install ...
- $ spack use mpich%gcc@4.4.7
+
+ $ spack use mpich %gcc@4.4.7
Prepending: mpich@3.0.4%gcc@4.4.7 (ok)
$ which mpicc
~/src/spack/opt/chaos_5_x86_64_ib/gcc@4.4.7/mpich@3.0.4/bin/mpicc
-Or, similarly with modules:
+Or, similarly with modules, you could type:
+
+.. code-block:: sh
+
$ spack load mpich %gcc@4.4.7
-The generated files will add appropriate directories to you ``PATH``,
-``MANPATH``, and ``LD_LIBRARY_PATH`` to assist you and other programs
-with finding the libraries you've installed.
+These commands will add appropriate directories to your ``PATH``,
+``MANPATH``, and ``LD_LIBRARY_PATH``. When you no longer want to use
+a package, you can type unload or unuse similarly:
-You can unuse/unload packages similarly.
+.. code-block:: sh
+
+ $ spack unload mpich %gcc@4.4.7 # modules
+ $ spack unuse mpich %gcc@4.4.7 # dotkit
-These commands are only available if you have enabled Spack's shell
-support, but they allow you to use Spack's abbreviated names for
-packages to get them into your environment.
+.. note::
+
+ These ``use``, ``unuse``, ``load``, and ``unload`` subcommands are
+ only available if you have enabled Spack's shell support *and* you
+ have dotkit or modules installed on your machine.
Ambiguous module names
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
@@ -806,6 +825,34 @@ used ``gcc``. You could therefore just type:
To identify just the one built with the Intel compiler.
+
+Regenerating Module files
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+Module and dotkit files are generated when packages are installed, and
+are placed in the following directories under the Spack root:
+
+ * ``$SPACK_ROOT/share/spack/modules``
+ * ``$SPACK_ROOT/share/spack/dotkit``
+
+Sometimes you may need to regenerate the modules files. For example,
+if newer, fancier module support is added to Spack at some later date,
+you may want to regenerate all the modules to take advantage of these
+new features.
+
+``spack module refresh``
+^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+
+Running ``spack module refresh`` will remove the
+``share/spack/modules`` and ``share/spack/dotkit`` directories, then
+regenerate all module and dotkit files from scratch:
+
+.. code-block:: sh
+
+ $ spack module refresh
+ ==> Regenerating tcl module files.
+ ==> Regenerating dotkit module files.
+
Getting Help
-----------------------