Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
* license bump year
* fix black issues of modified files
* mypy
* fix 2021 -> 2023
|
|
|
|
Explicitly import package utilities in all packages, and corresponding fallout.
This includes:
* rename `spack.package` to `spack.package_base`
* rename `spack.pkgkit` to `spack.package`
* update all packages in builtin, builtin_mock and tutorials to include `from spack.package import *`
* update spack style
* ensure packages include the import
* automatically add the new import and remove any/all imports of `spack` and `spack.pkgkit`
from packages when using `--fix`
* add support for type-checking packages with mypy when SPACK_MYPY_CHECK_PACKAGES
is set in the environment
* fix all type checking errors in packages in spack upstream
* update spack create to include the new imports
* update spack repo to inject the new import, injection persists to allow for a deprecation period
Original message below:
As requested @adamjstewart, update all packages to use pkgkit. I ended up using isort to do this,
so repro is easy:
```console
$ isort -a 'from spack.pkgkit import *' --rm 'spack' ./var/spack/repos/builtin/packages/*/package.py
$ spack style --fix
```
There were several line spacing fixups caused either by space manipulation in isort or by packages
that haven't been touched since we added requirements, but there are no functional changes in here.
* [x] add config to isort to make sure this is maintained going forward
|
|
|
|
- [x] add `concretize.lp`, `spack.yaml`, etc. to licensed files
- [x] update all licensed files to say 2013-2021 using
`spack license update-copyright-year`
- [x] appease mypy with some additions to package.py that needed
for oneapi.py
|
|
This commit address the case of concretizing a root spec with a
transitive conditional dependency on a virtual package, provided
by an external. Before these modifications default variant values
for the dependency bringing in the virtual package were not
respected, and the external package providing the virtual was added
to the DAG.
The issue stems from two facts:
- Selecting a provider has higher precedence than selecting default variants
- To ensure that an external is preferred, we used a negative weight
To solve it we shift all the providers weight so that:
- External providers have a weight of 0
- Non external provider have a weight of 10 or more
Using a weight of zero for external providers is such that having
an external provider, if present, or not having a provider at all
has the same effect on the higher priority minimization.
Also fixed a few minor bugs in concretize.lp, that were causing
spurious entries in the final answer set.
Cleaned concretize.lp from leftover rules.
|